Linked by the_randymon on Thu 10th Jan 2013 22:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548315
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why not just use a standard toolkit
by diegoviola on Fri 11th Jan 2013 07:13
in reply to "Why not just use a standard toolkit"
RE: Why not just use a standard toolkit
by ssokolow on Fri 11th Jan 2013 14:00
in reply to "Why not just use a standard toolkit"
At least GTK and QT apps can now read the same theme info, QT apps looks just fine under Gnome and well, have not tried GTK under KDE, but I assume that GTK is smart enough to do the right thing.
You assume too much.
Qt has QGtkStyle as an officially-supported component.
The GTK+ equivalent is a 3rd-party project that seems to have withered on the vine and the only build of it I've seen for modern Ubuntu is as part of the Trinity PPA. (Trinity is the KDE 3 fork)




Member since:
2006-11-19
One of the biggest problems of OpenOffice is that it uses its own GUI toolkit. I really which they would port it to uses GTK or QT.
At least GTK and QT apps can now read the same theme info, QT apps looks just fine under Gnome and well, have not tried GTK under KDE, but I assume that GTK is smart enough to do the right thing.
Anyway, QT does have its problems, but it is a better toolkit than the OpenOffice widget set.