Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 13th Jan 2013 14:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548605
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
MS is probably counting on the OEMs current total dependence on them to be crippling (due to the monopoly system the OEMs helped set up in the 90's). Almost all OEMs have no ability to do anything on the software side and currently rely on crapware layers to make their money after the MS tax.
MS sort of gets it, the only way for them to survive the commoditization wars is to commodotize part of the system itself.
Unless there are other very ugly terms going with ChromeOS it seems like a logical migration path for the OEMs to try.
MS sort of gets it, the only way for them to survive the commoditization wars is to commodotize part of the system itself.
Unless there are other very ugly terms going with ChromeOS it seems like a logical migration path for the OEMs to try.
I think the MS tax things is pretty mythical these days. I've popped in to many computer shops and what i see is:
* section for apple
* section for android tablets + chrome book (linux)
* section for windows laptop + desktops
In short Microsoft does not have a monopoly on personal computing, and most of the big OEMs are shipping Windows and Android (Linux) computers/tablets.




Member since:
2006-01-06
MS is probably counting on the OEMs current total dependence on them to be crippling (due to the monopoly system the OEMs helped set up in the 90's). Almost all OEMs have no ability to do anything on the software side and currently rely on crapware layers to make their money after the MS tax.
MS sort of gets it, the only way for them to survive the commoditization wars is to commodotize part of the system itself.
Unless there are other very ugly terms going with ChromeOS it seems like a logical migration path for the OEMs to try.