Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Jan 2013 15:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548740
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Prices and choice
by MOS6510 on Mon 14th Jan 2013 17:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Prices and choice"
According to my RSS reader stealing iPhones is a risky business. ;-)
It's a risk, but so is eating at McDonald's and crossing the streat.
I think it's better to get €120 for your old phone back than nothing. Personally I'd never pay that for a 3 year old mobile phone, but apparently a lot of people do, which also increases the market value.
RE[4]: Prices and choice
by Laurence on Tue 15th Jan 2013 09:35
in reply to "RE[3]: Prices and choice"
According to my RSS reader stealing iPhones is a risky business. ;-)
True, but thieves exist and do target things like phones. so my point stands
It's a risk, but so is eating at McDonald's and crossing the streat.
I wouldn't really class them as risks unless you're unduly stupid. At least not with odds even approaching the same degree as accidentally wiping the value from your phone.
What you're describing strikes me as the same misconception that some home buys have when house prices increase. They believe that they've earned money, but assuming hose price increases are relatively even (which nationally they generally are) when they come to sell, the money they've earned on their house will be lost on the next house which has also increased in price.
It's the same thing here, whatever resale price you earn from the iPhone will be absorbed in the next purchase of an iPhone. So you're not gaining anything at all (and that's assuming you can even resell it - which as I said - is a gamble).
And this is why I hate the resale excuse that some Apple fans cite when justifying the higher prices. And please bare in mind that I'm not condoning the higher prices (I don't really want to get into that debate to be honest). I just think that particular reasoning is deeply flawed.
Edited 2013-01-15 09:39 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-26
An iPhone 3GS still goes for over €100.
That's quite a gamble though as it assumes that the phone isn't lost, stolen nor damaged (yeah you could have insurance on the device, but then you have the excess fee eating into your resale margins).
Plus that money would only end up going towards the next upgrade, so you're not actually knocking 100euro off the buying cost of this phone.