Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Jan 2013 23:15 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 548867
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by RareBreed
by Delgarde on Tue 15th Jan 2013 20:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by RareBreed"
"Don't mix Software Engineering with CS names.
I'm absolutely for the existence Software Engineering courses; after all, there's a huge need in today's world for applied software engineers, and plenty folks who desire such jobs. I just hate it when such courses call themselves 'Computer Science' [1] when the curriculum clearly is not. "
Eh, the line is somewhat blurry. Most CS degrees increasingly include a lot of practical stuff, while CE also covers theory. Not worth making a fuss over, I think.
RE[5]: Comment by RareBreed
by kwan_e on Tue 15th Jan 2013 23:53
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by RareBreed"
Everyone's perfectly happy to distinguish between, say, Applied and Theoretical Physics, so why conflate Applied and Theoretical Computing?
That is because the boundary between Applied and Theoretical Computing is blurred.
"If I apply this patch, this should theoretically work"




Member since:
2006-11-28
I'm absolutely for the existence Software Engineering courses; after all, there's a huge need in today's world for applied software engineers, and plenty folks who desire such jobs. I just hate it when such courses call themselves 'Computer Science' [1] when the curriculum clearly is not.
Personally I think a big heaping dose of honesty is needed from universities... and from students too. Everyone's perfectly happy to distinguish between, say, Applied and Theoretical Physics, so why conflate Applied and Theoretical Computing? The only reason I can think of is ego marketing: students want to be software engineers but call themselves 'computer scientists' because that sounds cleverer.
And so everyone forgets what CS actually is and what it's meant to do: push the boundaries and [re]define the state of the art. Just as in the sciences, you need a vibrant theoretical community generating new ideas and improvements that can eventually feed into the applied world, otherwise the latter grows close-minded and stagnant. It's not healthy, but I suspect a lot in the programming world isn't what it ought to be.
[1] Which should probably be called 'Computer Math', but that's a separate gripe.