Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Jan 2013 23:15 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 548930
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by RareBreed
by satsujinka on Wed 16th Jan 2013 06:11
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by RareBreed"




Member since:
2009-06-30
"pure functional" = functional,
"functional" = maybe functional, maybe not - review the code.
OTOH, I agree that current pure functional languages are too limiting/inconvenient in practice.