Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Jan 2013 23:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549167
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BTW, you might find http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/mouse_vs._keyboard/ interesting.
Edited 2013-01-22 17:56 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
Then these are not people looking to be productive I suppose. Which is what I thought was the point.
It's time the "typers" learn to understand that "mousers" can be just as quick and productive with a good visually thought out interface as the "typers" are with their run dialogs. A good interface accomodates both types of users. Being a "typer" A. doesn't make you a power user, B. is just a personal preference. You are not a more advanced user just because you prefer a keyboard to a mouse.
TIFKAM is not a good "mousers" interface. It's intrusive, it has ginormous tiles on that start screen that take up valuable screenreal estate and it forces you to lose visual contact with whatever you were doing if you invoke it. We don't need icons the size of Manhattan, the old size was damn near perfect for use with a mouse. We don't need a start menu that eats all screen real estate and forces a cognitive context switch. Crummy as the old start menu is, it is much better at preserving the context in which you are working.
We are not afraid of change, but we want change that is significantly better. Not change that some other people can live with, because (luckily for them) it doesn't stomp over their previously acquired workflows and doesn't worsen their experience.