Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Jan 2013 23:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549227
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I dunno. I use teminals and vim/elvis so these "extraneous" keys aren't so important to me. I much prefer this pgup/pgdn configuration for web browsing use. The keyboard feel and typing speed I can get is the same as my ergo keyboards, that's what matters.
Seems like your keyboard nazi stuff is all about the fluff and not about choosing applications that properly leverage keyboard usage.
I much prefer this pgup/pgdn configuration for web browsing use.
That might very well fit nicely on a laptop keyboard in comparison to a normal one. Older ThinkPad keyboards have the typical 2x3 matrix (Insert, Delete, Home, End, Page up, Page down) on the top right which is "too far away", compared to where this block is located on a normal (full size) keyboard.
Seems like your keyboard nazi stuff is all about the fluff and not about choosing applications that properly leverage keyboard usage.
In fact, it's not, as I typically value applications that make good use of the keyboard to allow efficient work. Editors (like vim) are a good example, even some web browsers pay attention to provide a good keyboard interface, while integrating it well with mouse action (for example mouse gestures).
I jsut wanted to point out what looked "atypical" to me when first looking at the keyboard. Note that I consider it the main input method for creating content. For consuming content, it doesn't play a big role, but on the other hand, different device formats (smartphones and tablets) may be better suited for consuming content than a laptop. Revisiting who the laptop is intended for, it should be judged if the keyboard layout (and its "shortcomings" and "incensistencies") match with the software that is provided by the system.
In such an environment, keys like "Scroll Lock" or "Pause / Break" can surely be omitted. Maybe even "Insert" is not needed. Many keys have a certain "historic background" and are important to power users or specific branches only. It heavily depends on how good the software is designed.
Edited 2013-01-18 13:41 UTC




Member since:
2006-10-08
Looking at the keyboard, there are few things that I've noticed:
1. Even though it claims to run some Android OS, why does it come with a "Windows" advertising key?
2. There is no "Insert" key, only "Delete" at the top right.
3. The "inverted T" cursor block looks a bit strange, especially in regards of the "Page Up" and "Page Down" keys. Isn't that unergonomic or at least uncomfortable?
4. It has a "Fn" key, but no key labels for the numeric block "additional layout" which can be addressed by Fn + letters of the right keyboard half. Also, no "Num Lock" key.
5. No "Scroll Lock" and "Pause / Break" keys.
6. Instead a "Print Screen" key between the right "Alt" and "Ctrl" keys, where usually the context menu key (which is also missing) is placed.
I can only assume that this deviation from default keyboard capabilities has been considered "in line with the software and the purpose of the device", so it's not a major limitation for its future users:
http://googleenterprise.blogspot.de/2013/01/for-schools-new-lenovo-...
Maybe it's safe to assume that the future users won't be typing much, especially not higher amounts of numbers, so probably everything is fine.
I'm fully aware of the fact that I'm a keyboard nazi, and I see things nobody else can see. :-)
Image for reference:
http://www.lenovo.com/shop/americas/content/img_lib/portals/ps/educ...