Linked by Yoni on Fri 18th Jan 2013 21:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549360
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem isn't with Microsoft innovating, the problem is with Microsoft removing freedoms and useful functionality and forcing round-about ways of doing things in the name of innovation.
That seems to be Apple's way of innovating. So the article author was right, but the double standard goes the other way. It's a case of projection.
"The problem isn't with Microsoft innovating, the problem is with Microsoft removing freedoms and useful functionality and forcing round-about ways of doing things in the name of innovation.
That seems to be Apple's way of innovating. So the article author was right, but the double standard goes the other way. It's a case of projection. "
Don't try to twist what I said. It's not innovation when Apple does it nor is it innovation when Microsoft does it.





Member since:
2006-02-15
Rubbish.
The problem isn't with Microsoft innovating, the problem is with Microsoft removing freedoms and useful functionality and forcing round-about ways of doing things in the name of innovation. The complaints are about Metro's short-comings, not about Microsoft trying to innovate, and you seem to be terribly confused about that. You do realize that one can appreciate development and innovation while still criticizing the short-comings, yes?