Linked by Yoni on Fri 18th Jan 2013 21:56 UTC
Apple "Never mind the fact that the iPod turned the entire music industry on its head. Never mind the fact that most successful notebooks today resemble designs first popularized by Apple. Never mind the fact that the blueprint of the modern day smartphone remains the original iPhone. Never mind the fact that competitors are scrambling wildly to copy the success and design of the iPad. Forget all of these things, because when it comes to Apple, the 'what have you done for me lately?' mentality reigns supreme."
Thread beginning with comment 549429
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Reponse
by No it isnt on Sat 19th Jan 2013 12:34 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Reponse"
No it isnt
Member since:
2005-11-14

You suffer from the delusion that smooth scrolling is the benchmark of all things. It's not. Smooth scrolling existed on the C64, a very slow computer with a very shitty OS by today's standards.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[7]: Reponse
by Laurence on Sun 20th Jan 2013 13:05 in reply to "RE[6]: Reponse"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

Smooth scrolling existed on the C64, a very slow computer with a very shitty OS by today's standards

To be honest, even in those days I found Microsoft Basic to be sub par compared to some of the BASIC interpreters being released in Europe.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Reponse
by MOS6510 on Sun 20th Jan 2013 13:15 in reply to "RE[7]: Reponse"
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

I think Commodore was just being cheap. The Commodore 64 basically (haha) used the same BASIC as its predecessor the VIC-20. It's strange to imagine them releasing a computer with some nifty chips (video & sound) and no BASIC commands to make use of them, but they did.

I used to have a BASIC translation poster. It listed (haha) a number of commands and how they were implemented on a number of home computers. The Commodore 64 often had to do with PRINTing some character string or POKEing a memory location.

Not everybody was happy with Simons' BASIC (I liked it), but it would have been a huge improvement over BASIC 2.0 and it made it easy to do graphics, sounds, sprites and redefined character sets. It also still left a lot of memory free for the program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simons'_BASIC

Reply Parent Score: 2