Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Jan 2013 23:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549684
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Digital design is plain ugly
by tkeith on Mon 21st Jan 2013 17:00
in reply to "RE: Digital design is plain ugly"
That has zero to do with this discussion, and I have no clue why you brought it up. But since you did, I have to say that you're fooling yourself; Android may be based on a Free software stack but it's no more Free than iOS. Just as OS X/iOS are based on FreeBSD, yet they are not Free OSes given all the proprietary crap included, so it is with Android (albeit to a lesser extent).
What if he just meant freedom to sideload apps and customize the phone to his liking. Not everyone wants or cares about a stallman-esce version of "freedom". I think he was just saying why he doesn't personally use iOS, despite liking the design.
RE[3]: Digital design is plain ugly
by Morgan on Mon 21st Jan 2013 23:56
in reply to "RE[2]: Digital design is plain ugly"
RE[3]: Digital design is plain ugly
by kwan_e on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 01:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Digital design is plain ugly"




Member since:
2005-06-29
Visually, advanced analog designs, such as Mac OS X (Aqua) and Windows (Vista/7; Aero Glass) and iPhone/iOS beats the crap of Windows 8/Phone 8 and digital designs.
That's purely subjective; everyone has their own feelings on this subject. There was a time in the past when I was all for the analog, drop-shadow and wobbly windows effects you could get with compositing WMs. These days, I want the GUI to take a step back and get out of my way so I can get work done. The less unnecessary distraction, the better! But again that's just my perspective.
The reason I'm using Android, is because Apple lacks Freedom. And I demand Freedom-respecting devices.
That has zero to do with this discussion, and I have no clue why you brought it up. But since you did, I have to say that you're fooling yourself; Android may be based on a Free software stack but it's no more Free than iOS. Just as OS X/iOS are based on FreeBSD, yet they are not Free OSes given all the proprietary crap included, so it is with Android (albeit to a lesser extent).
Just because you can sideload apps and get certain portions of last year's source code does not mean Android is Free software. For a much better analysis than I could ever provide, please go here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/19/android-free-softw...