Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Jan 2013 21:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549764
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: really - what's wrong with *DAV?
by uteck on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 00:09
in reply to "really - what's wrong with *DAV?"
RE: really - what's wrong with *DAV?
by Nelson on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 00:35
in reply to "really - what's wrong with *DAV?"
RE[2]: really - what's wrong with *DAV?
by shmerl on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 01:53
in reply to "RE: really - what's wrong with *DAV?"





Member since:
2006-03-20
I've heard some sentiment that the DAV protocols aren't as good / useful as ActiveSync.
Appreciate if someone can reply with information as to the truth of this?