Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Jan 2013 21:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549792
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: really - what's wrong with *DAV?
by shmerl on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 03:57
in reply to "RE[3]: really - what's wrong with *DAV?"
It still accomplishes the same goal - removes the burden of the constant polling from the server. Somewhat similar to how BOSH is used for XMPP. Surely full duplex communication is preferable, that's why WebSockets were designed for web servers. Are there any efforts for such communication in e-mail protocols? ActiveSync is irrelevant, since it's not an open protocol. So what else?
RE[5]: really - what's wrong with *DAV?
by Nelson on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 04:03
in reply to "RE[4]: really - what's wrong with *DAV?"





Member since:
2005-11-29
It isn't true push.