To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think Good enough quantifies it enough, I'm interested in how they compare on battery life.
It could go either way. Are the EAS supporters overstating the disadvantages of IMAP IDLE or the other way around?
I haven't seen a concrete comparison (and its tough, because a lot of this is heavy on jargon and long boring RFC documents that I don't really have the time to read) but I'd be interested in one.
I also wonder if IMAP IDLE is coming with DAV. Windows Phone already supports IMAP, so IMAP IDLE seems like low hanging fruit.
Are there are extensions to IMAP which enable true push? Are there efforts underway?
I think if we truly want to have choice when it comes to syncing solutions, these are important questions that need to be laid to rest.





Member since:
2005-11-29
I don't really think it is the case. People use EAS because it is the best solution. The people I know that interact with it on a daily basis swear by it.
I find it backwards to complain about something, but offer up no alternative which replicates its functionality. There is no equivalent to EAS. It is the best at what it does.
That is all I am saying.