Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 20th Jan 2013 23:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549848
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Beerfloat
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 11:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Beerfloat"
I don't think anyone can seriously claim Google designed Android <= 4.x as a windowed operating system. Anyone aside from Thom, that is.
And yet, nobody's been able to provide a counterargument to my statement - other than adding arbitrary restrictions to the established definition.
RE[4]: Comment by Beerfloat
by Beerfloat on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 15:21
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Beerfloat"
And yet, nobody's been able to provide a counterargument to my statement - other than adding arbitrary restrictions to the established definition.
Probably because the statement is so non-specific and lacking in context as to become meaningless. Here's what you copy/pasted from Wikipedia:
"A window runs a self-contained program, isolated from other programs that (if in a multi-program operating system) run at the same time in other windows."
If your reading of that definition of a window were to be mistaken for conclusive, any visual output from programs in a multitasking OS would qualify as windows. In order to be able to lump full-screen task switching mobile operating systems in with the WIMP crowd, you ignore 40 years of computing history defining what those 'other windows' look and behave like.
In fact, the very Wiki page that you lifted your definition from notes the following, just 2 lines before the sentence you selected:
Some GUIs are not based in windows, icons, menus, and pointers. For example, most mobile phones represent actions as icons, and some may have menus, but very few include a pointer or run programs in a window.





Member since:
2011-06-05
Well that's Android for you, isn't it? People can do what they want with it, which is cool in my book, though I've heard some others claim this kind of fragmentation is not a net positive.
But that's neither here nor there. There's a reference Android out there, and despite the availability of some cool hacks, I don't think anyone can seriously claim Google designed Android <= 4.x as a windowed operating system. Anyone aside from Thom, that is.