Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 550005
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Linux is a kernel
by winter skies on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 10:34
in reply to "RE[6]: Linux is a kernel"
"Even then, there is quality Linux desktop software which one simply cannot get for Windows:
http://www.digikam.org/about/overview
http://www.calligra.org/
http://www.kde.org/applications/education/cantor/
http://www.digikam.org/about/overview
http://www.calligra.org/
http://www.kde.org/applications/education/cantor/
Digikam: http://sourceforge.net/projects/digikam/files/digikam/2.2.0/
Calligra: http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-packages-for-windows-released...
Cantor: "If you have windows, then you can use The KDE on Windows Project, please note that there is already a Cantor.exe ported to windows, so is not necesary build the application. Otherwise, you can build and install kdelibs from sources."
So, uhh, your point...? "
So please try to start Digikam 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0RC on Windows 7 64bit and report back your results, I'm sure we're all gonna have fun.
Just to say that developers providing executables or installers for Windows does not mean that applications just a click away on Linux work equally well on Windows, or work at all.
RE[8]: Linux is a kernel
by WereCatf on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 10:49
in reply to "RE[7]: Linux is a kernel"
So please try to start Digikam 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0RC on Windows 7 64bit and report back your results, I'm sure we're all gonna have fun.
Just to say that developers providing executables or installers for Windows does not mean that applications just a click away on Linux work equally well on Windows, or work at all.
Just to say that developers providing executables or installers for Windows does not mean that applications just a click away on Linux work equally well on Windows, or work at all.
What are you saying? That KDE- and DigiKam-developers are incompetent and therefore can't get DigiKam working properly? I'd say that's quite an insult. I have no idea why you'd think it'd be fun. Personally I trust their word when they say it works.
Also, it works perfectly well under 64-bit Windows 7, with absolutely NO issues:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam1.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam2.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam3.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam4.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam5.jpg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11811685/digikam6.jpg
Edited 2013-01-23 10:51 UTC





Member since:
2006-02-15
If only quantity equaled quality..
Why would one? Most of the same stuff works under Windows just fine.
Yes, I know what package managers are. Personally I prefer Gentoo's Portage, but each to their own.
Not all the same stuff is available for Linux.
http://www.digikam.org/about/overview
http://www.calligra.org/
http://www.kde.org/applications/education/cantor/
Digikam: http://sourceforge.net/projects/digikam/files/digikam/2.2.0/
Calligra: http://www.calligra.org/news/calligra-packages-for-windows-released...
Cantor: "If you have windows, then you can use The KDE on Windows Project, please note that there is already a Cantor.exe ported to windows, so is not necesary build the application. Otherwise, you can build and install kdelibs from sources."
So, uhh, your point...?