Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 11:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550109
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You obviously decided to concentrate on the unimportant part of the message. This is a classic way to produce noise, in a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the main message.
One is taken "hand in the bag" bullying a smaller competitor with written threat beyond acceptable level. The other is mailing to a collaborator that he prefers not to write about non-recruitment agreement (and by saying so, he leaves a trace).
In what way is this "comparable" to the point of deliberately mixing the two to make them look like equal ?
Oh i see, since we don't know what the second did, it must have been as terrible as one can imagine certainly ! No proof, so no limit to imagination.




Member since:
2005-09-27
There is no evidence that Eric Schmidt did the same, and certainly this was not in the culture of Google back in the time
Google apologizers are the worse, no doubt.