Linked by kragil on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 20:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550151
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 21:22
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Laurence"
It is a valid Go code, I took it from one of golang.org examples, my point is, just like in C++, it can become unreadable with not much effort.
But that's the case for all languages. Keeping any sufficiently complicated language tidy takes effort.
Quite honestly, I think it's silly making comments like these when you've not even written one line of code. If nothing else, it smacks of prejudice. So how about you actually give the language a try before passing judgement? Or STFU and let people who have used the language comment.
Edited 2013-01-23 21:25 UTC
RE[7]: Comment by Laurence
by Hiev on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 21:30
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Laurence"
But that's the case for all languages.
Nope, some are ironed for these kind of stuff, some fail to do so.
Quite honestly, I think it's silly making comments like these when you've not even written one line of code.
You have the premise that I don't write code, cute.
Or STFU and let people who have used the language comment.
Why only the people who have used the language? how about those who have reasons to avoid it at any cost?
Edited 2013-01-23 21:31 UTC





Member since:
2005-09-27
It is a valid Go code, I took it from one of golang.org examples, my point is, just like in C++, it can become unreadable with not much effort.
Edited 2013-01-23 21:09 UTC