Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 22:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550314
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Better than last year = disappointement?
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 24th Jan 2013 10:51
in reply to "RE[2]: Better than last year = disappointement?"
And, which psychic told you that $700 is their max level??
Well, wasn't their highest value somewhere around there, after which it dropped to its current level? That's no guarantee, of course (hence the "apparently"), but it does highlight the idiocy of statements that it would shoot right on through to $1000.
And, why did you select Reuters as your source? Hmmm...
Because cows, that's why.
RE[4]: Better than last year = disappointement?
by brichpmr on Thu 24th Jan 2013 11:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Better than last year = disappointement?"
"And, which psychic told you that $700 is their max level??
Well, wasn't their highest value somewhere around there, after which it dropped to its current level? That's no guarantee, of course (hence the "apparently"), but it does highlight the idiocy of statements that it would shoot right on through to $1000.
And, why did you select Reuters as your source? Hmmm...
Because cows, that's why. "
99.999% of tech or any businesses would kill for Apple's disappointing results last quarter, but the future? Who the hell knows? I remember when Apple finally came back with a profit quarter more than a decade ago; and analysts were creaming their jeans. I dislike over-hyped expectations from anyone.
RE[3]: Better than last year = disappointement?
by BallmerKnowsBest on Thu 24th Jan 2013 18:57
in reply to "RE[2]: Better than last year = disappointement?"
And, which psychic told you that $700 is their max level?? And, why did you select Reuters as your source? Hmmm...
Durrrrr, ya think maybe it could have something to do with the fact that Reuters is of the most widely-used newswire services in the world? ...nah, that couldn't be it, must just be Thom's "anti-Appe bias".





Member since:
2006-04-22
And, which psychic told you that $700 is their max level?? And, why did you select Reuters as your source? Hmmm...
Here's an interesting dashboard analysis for comparison:
http://www.splatf.com/2013/01/apple-dec12earnings-charts/
Edited 2013-01-24 10:51 UTC