Linked by the_randymon on Fri 25th Jan 2013 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550438
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I fail to see how this can be called Arch Linux if is making use of a BSD kernel.
It's not called 'Arch Linux'. It's called 'Arch BSD'. Just like Arch's Hurd variant is called 'Arch Hurd'.
[edit]
It might also be worth pointing out that the OSNews headline isn't the same as the linked article's, which reads: Arch BSD: Arch Linux Atop The FreeBSD Kernel
Edited 2013-01-25 11:43 UTC
RE[2]: Arch BSD, right?
by the_randymon on Fri 25th Jan 2013 12:47
in reply to "RE: Arch BSD, right?"
Original submitter here. The title I'd originally proposed was, "What do you get when you cross ArchLinux and FreeBSD?"
As to the question, "why do something like this, when Arch has a limited number of followers and FreeBSD has a limited number of followers?" the answer is clearly, "to see if we can do it." It's the best answer for half of the cool stuff that hackers and tinkerers do, these days. Be glad we can tinker at all - the massive gadget/device lockdown isn't far off, I'd say.





Member since:
2005-07-08
I fail to see how this can be called Arch Linux if is making use of a BSD kernel.