Linked by the_randymon on Fri 25th Jan 2013 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550440
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
When I used to use BSD systems as a desktop, is because I didn't want to use Linux after a lot of it at the time was not particularly well documented compared to other systems like OpenBSD.
I've always preferred the OpenBSD ... if we say it supported it works, if we say it doesn't it doesn't or is likely to cause headaches.
RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Fri 25th Jan 2013 12:28
in reply to "RE: Comment by MOS6510"
I've used FreeBSD for a while on the desktop, but I already had a few years Linux experience (which we had running on servers at work) and too many things were the same, slightly different or very different.
In the end I found it too confusing to be using both so I sadly had to let go of FreeBSD.





Member since:
2011-05-12
There aren't that many Arch Linux and FreeBSD (desktop) users, so the targeted audience for this ehm, operating system, is a small subset of these two combined groups.
To me it seems FreeBSD users use FreeBSD because they like FreeBSD and want to use FreeBSD. Same for Arch Linux users with Arch Linux. Just wondering why they'd give up any experience for opting for a less pure experience.
It's not like FreeBSD is slow or people don't love Arch Linux.