
In the past, OS News
has discussed how U.S. broadband access lags many other countries in terms of cost, speed, and availability. Now,
this detailed report from the New America Foundation tells why. It all comes down to a lack of competition among the carriers, which can be traced back to the days when cable companies were granted local monopolies. The report argues that "...data caps... are hardly a necessity. Rather, they are motivated by a desire to further increase revenues from existing subscribers and protect legacy services such as cable television from competing Internet services." The report's conclusion: don't expect improvements without legislative action.
Member since:
2005-07-06
I've personally had terrible experiences with both companies, but at the moment I'd give a slight edge to Bell. The main one is that they're offering fiber-to-the-home - an actual upgrade to their services. Rogers seems to be actively downgrading their level of service, while milking their existing customer base as much as possible. (caps & throttling + price increases). I was also REALLY not impressed when I found out that Rogers uses different caps for different regions - in Ontario, I think it's 250GB, compared to a 75GB cap in Atlantic Canada (same monthly cost, though).