Linked by the_randymon on Fri 25th Jan 2013 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550565
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It already has one: pkgng.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer
It already has one: pkgng.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer
https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer
It's not clear from there if it can do a simple "yum update".
Debian FreeBSD, Arch BSD etc .. The FreeBSD project should take note and implement a proper binary packages system before they get lost into irrelevance even more.
FreeBSD needs a good "yum" or "apt" implementation.
FreeBSD needs a good "yum" or "apt" implementation.
No thanks. My FreeBSD installations have been perfectly free of dependency hell for years, and FreeBSD has one of the best package managers around. It actually compares to pacman in philosophy, as in, get the hell out of the way and let me install things. Apt and Yum, on the other hand: well, I've had more hell from those two than I ever had from Windows dll hell. Keep them out of my *BSD installations. We don't want them here.




Member since:
2010-09-25
Debian FreeBSD, Arch BSD etc .. The FreeBSD project should take note and implement a proper binary packages system before they get lost into irrelevance even more.
FreeBSD needs a good "yum" or "apt" implementation.