Linked by the_randymon on Tue 29th Jan 2013 01:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550700
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by some1 on Tue 29th Jan 2013 13:50
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
10" is hardly a "smaller screen". It's twice the size of Nexus 7. The first thing I thought was: there's too much space to usefully cover in most apps; this can show more than one app at a time, e.g. mail and calendar and notes or weather. Other tablets had tiling before, e.g. Adam. We can hardly fail Samsung for trying to make the device more useful. The idea is right, and however crappy their implementation is you don't have to use it. Maybe Google will do it better in stock.
RE[5]: Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Tue 29th Jan 2013 14:37
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Laurence"
10" is hardly a "smaller screen".
I wasn't suggesting a 10" tablet is small.
Let me refer you back to my original comment for better context:
I will say, I quite liked the idea behind Win8's multi-Window in (the artist formally known as) Metro. It's clean way of tiling Windows. But even that would only be practical on a larger tablet (such as this 10"). Anything smaller and managing Windows will be a nightmare
Thus my point you're querying is in reference to how most Android powered devices are 7" and under.
Edited 2013-01-29 14:39 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-26
I'm genuinely not that fussed about proper tiling. Like I said in my original post; it's always going to be a little awkward on smaller screens (which the vast majority of Android ROMs are running on).
Plus I don't really think you can criticize Google here as they're much quicker at pushing out new features than Microsoft and Apple (although maybe that trend is changing?)
Edited 2013-01-29 10:11 UTC