Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2013 00:38 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems Marco Arment: "Everyone should play by the same rules. A proposal: storage capacities referenced or implied in the names or advertisements for personal computers, tablets, and smartphones should not exceed the amount of space available for end-user installation of third-party applications and data, after enough software has been installed to enable all commonly advertised functionality. With today's OSes, iPads could advertise capacities no larger than 12, 28, 60, and 124 GB and the Surface Pros could be named 23 and 83 GB." Wholly agreed. When I buy a box of 100 staples, I expect it to contain ~100 staples - not 50 because the other 50 are holding the box together.
Thread beginning with comment 550873
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by MOS6510
by Bishi on Wed 30th Jan 2013 10:50 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510"
Bishi
Member since:
2009-08-27

So in essence we are saying the same thing: everyone should know what they are buying, and what they can do with the device.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 30th Jan 2013 10:55 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

Yes, I think that's universally good advice.

And I just want to keeps things simple and correct. Stating the total storage amount is more simple (it's 100% correct) than stating the amount of free space, which can change with updates to the system.

Maybe Microsoft will make their Windows install in Surface smaller after people complain regarding the free space. Then a 18 GB Surface would be able to hold 22 GB. It would make even less sense than a 16 GB device being able to store 12 of user content.

Reply Parent Score: 2