Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th Jan 2013 22:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550885
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Comment by Laurence
by Lennie on Fri 1st Feb 2013 10:19
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by Laurence"
A HTML5 app has it's own advantages. You never have to update, it is done automatically. This saves on a lot on tech-support for business applications.
A lot of applications need to store their data on a server anyway.
In the case of HTML5 you can keep the application on a server too (automatically downloaded and possibly cached for offline-usage).
That means you can change for example the data-model of the application a lot easier without keeping compatibility with older versions.
This saves tremendously on development time.




Member since:
2007-03-26
Securing local storage would take more work than using a native application to begin with.
I think you guys are getting a little hung up on my comments thinking I'm anti-web development, so I'm going to turn my argument on it's head in the hope that you can understand the point I'm trying to make:
I wouldn't use a compiled C++ app to search Google and return the results. Sure, it could be done, but it wouldn't be using the best tool for that job. Equally, HTML5 isn't always the best tool for app development, even though most ideas these days can be written in HTML5.
Edited 2013-01-30 11:58 UTC