Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2013 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551086
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-08-06
imo it will be almost impossible to really push out a revolutionary mobile interface.
Why? Because you can invent the wheel just so many times.
Does it have to be revolutionary? Does it have to be so much better then Android and iOS?
I think it just have to be on par or marginally better.
Maybe i am just daft but i cannot see how the latest iterations of Android and iOS can be left suddenly antiquated by a new mobile OS. Especially a version 1.
Think about it. You use you phone to dial, do messaging, launch apps, do photos and a few other things. How many variations to launch this tasks can we get? And how much will this new task methodology really improve on other modern phone OS's that the others feel well, antique?
IMO Blackberry did a good job.
They build it and now we hope the people and the app developers will come.
They have a good basis for the future and if this does not turn things around, rumor is Lenovo or others will take the torch and run with Blackberry.
Edited 2013-01-31 23:31 UTC