To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Got to agree here.
I'm really attached my MacBook & iPhone these days.
But in all honesty, outside North America's wealthy, Apple of the 80's and early 90's was a complete irrelevance - I never saw an Apple II in the shops in the UK - ever. No-one owned one. No-one wanted one. I never saw one outside a magazine until I started work at BAe Space Systems in 1989 (they used one to run their environmental test ovens for satellite battery arrays). The Mac? Again, not in the flesh until university in 1990 - and even then, limited to one room - there were vastly more HP Apollo, Sun Sparc, or even ARM workstations than Mac's - the Mac was a toy that Atari and Commodore owners just laughed at (or emulated for DTP, at a quarter of the price with larger displays, faster CPUs and more memory).
And the Lisa - well, it didn't even make enough of an impression to get magazine coverage outside retrospectives on the Mac years later.
Well, the lack of self awareness of the Amiga and ST users has always been legendary...
Edited 2013-02-03 21:44 UTC




Member since:
2011-05-12
Thanks for the interesting links!
I'm an Apple person and I think these old 80's Macs are cute, but I would never have bought one back then and if I had I'm pretty sure to have been disappointed. The Atari ST and Amiga were much more powerful and well, more fun. I guess even an Apple 2 or Commodore 64 was more fun. More software, both serious and games. Even the ZX Spectrum had better looking games.
It's odd the Mac was marketed as the computer for the rest of us, because even without accounting for inflation if would be darn expensive today.
Also it seems the Lisa tried to be more innovative than the Mac.