Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Feb 2013 12:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551339
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
and is quite successful.
yes, it's not as spectacular a failure as the other formats, but successful is something different
just to break down the numbers:
-BR is 7 years old, and for 5 years it's the only HD disc-format
-it has better image- and sound-quality than the dvd
-it's more expensive to produce (both content and manufacturing-wise)
-and even though they are sold at the same price-level as DVDs, they only account for 20-25% of all sales
that's a failure all around
Blu-ray isn't in the same category as the rest and is quite successful
It is only as successful as it is because a lot of us are reluctantly downgrading to blu-ray from DVD, as a result of movie studios only putting out special features and box sets for certain movies in the BR format.
Otherwise, I could live without the higher prices, DRM, mandatory firmware updates, unskippable previews, spotty auto-resume support, etc.
Sony simply does a lot, so they obviously also have a rather large number of ~failures. And as for successes - you don't remember them since they become generic, hence naturally not associated exclusively with Sony any more; that's what being a success means for formats.
the 3.5-inch floppy, CD, S/PDIF (what do you think "S" stands for?), Betacam, Video8, miniDV, DVD ...all rather successful (yes, half of them in cooperation with other companies; but so is your list)





Member since:
2005-07-06
md, umd, ms, sacd, beta, bluray
is there any format sony didn't fail with?