To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Laurence, is there any proof to back up that statement ? Do they actually have any proof about Sony blocking Nintendo from using a cd drive ?
According to Wikipedia Nintendo chose it and I remember at the time when I got my n64 reading Nintendo wanted to use Cartridges, this is why it all seems a bit bullshit to me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_64DD -- optical drive addon for wii. --> also dont forget this little gem which was Japan only.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_64
"Nintendo cited several advantages for making the N64 cartridge-based.[40] Primarily cited was the ROM cartridges' very fast load times in comparison to disc-based games, as contemporary CD-ROM drives rarely had speeds above 4×" ... Read that section and look at the references for corroboration.
http://nintendo.wikia.com/wiki/SNES_CD-ROM -- the snes cdrom flop.
Sony might have blocked it, but I doubt philips or matsushita or any of the other companies would give a damn what sony said and would supply Nintendo, it just sounds very bullshit to me.
* The SNES CDROM was never released (only prototyped).
* The CDi is a completely different type of kit entirely (I know, I've used one).
* And the N64DD addon isn't even a CD - it's a magnetic disk.
Presumably developing the magnetic disk took longer than Nintendo could hang on (for risk of missing the next generation of console launches). So they had to fall back on tried and tested technologies first.
Which is why I said "if this is true"
So you'd trust an article which could have been written by anyone and based on here'say over one that was written by developers who had a contract with Nintendo?
I don't want to sound to down on your opinions as there's a chance you might be right, but it does read a little like you've already made your mind up and are now looking for the facts to prove your point.
You do realise how marketing works, right? IF Sony did block Nintendo, then Nintendo are hardly going to announce "Our consoles are going to be crippled compared to the other games consoles being released." that would just be retarded. So of course they'd spin it to argue that they'd chosen a cartridge based system and to list of it's advantages - even if they didn't believe that crap themselves.
This is marketing 101.
You maybe right, but I'm not sure I'd trust your gut instinct more than I trust developers who were writing games for Nintendo's various consoles at that time.
Edited 2013-02-04 16:24 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-26
Did you actually read any of the bit I quoted or the article it came from?
It categorically states why Nintendo ended up with cartridges on the N64 and they Nintendo broke their deal with Sony (see article for that explanation).