Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551404
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think it's clear at all, you mention the Nexus 4 at least 3 times by my count, including in your lead paragraph. Furthermore you often refer to 'the nexus' without specifying whether you mean the galaxy nexus or the nexus 4 in that specific instance.
Now that Google has fired a shot across the bow with its low pricing for the unlocked Nexus 4, where does that leave Samsung and its flagship handset?
You seem to be comparing the S3 against the Galaxy Nexus, the Nexus 4 and some nebulous group of 'chinese phones'. You pick and chose which phone to compare the S3 against for each point to give the best arbitrary score to the S3. Comparing the S2 to the Galaxy Nexus and the S3 to the Nexus 4 are probably more fair comparisons, and undisclosed 'chinese phones' should probably be left out entirely.
I think I made it pretty clear, that the comparison was vs. Galaxy Nexus (with Google Android 4.0), not the Nexus 4.
No. You did not. Your references to the $350 Nexus 4 make it all muddy. You do know that Galaxy Nexus was also $350 before Nexus 4 became available, right?
Also, implying that Galaxy Nexus glass is unfortified. It's the same as Gorilla Glass, but generic.
Sorry, it was an error in editing that's responsible for the confusion. I'll try to clear it up in the article. The author did the comparison with the Galaxy Nexus, and I wanted to bring the article up-to-date with the newly released Nexus 4, and that difference is where the confusion lies.




Member since:
2007-03-16
I think I made it pretty clear, that the comparison was vs. Galaxy Nexus (with Google Android 4.0), not the Nexus 4.