Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551475
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by WorknMan on Tue 5th Feb 2013 04:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
Seriously, if you want these things you're welcome to go to those phones whose manufacturers have paid the respective extorsion fees. I'm quite happy with the cheap Nexus 4, thank you very much.
Well, that's my point... if you want the stock Android experience and updates as they come out, you do not have an option, other than what Google sells. Thus, they need more variety in their catalog.
Seriously what is it with people and LTE? It is only a way to eat more battery and hit your download limits more quickly..
It does not hit your download limit more quickly... it makes your data connection faster. If you download a 40MB podcast, it's still the same amount of data, whether it took 1 minute or 15 to download it. And the cool thing is, you can toggle back to 3g when you don't need it, saving battery life. Even still, the battery drain isn't quite as severe on newer devices/LTE chipsets.
As for the necessity of it, that depends on how fast your HSPA connection is. a 2mbps, HSPA connection (what I was initially getting) can b quite miserable, vs 15mbps+ on LTE. Obviously, the difference isn't always that dramatic... just depends on where you are, and how well you have tuned your APN settings
Personally? I'd rather have the option of turning it on when I wanted to, vs not having it. Just last week, I was happy when I tweaked my APN settings and got 13mbps outsie. A friend of mine, who has an unlimited plan on Verizon, put up a screenshot of his 28mbps speed test. Between the two? I would rather have the latter
Edited 2013-02-05 04:19 UTC
RE[3]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by WereCatf on Tue 5th Feb 2013 08:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
RE[3]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by bentoo on Tue 5th Feb 2013 17:49
in reply to "RE[2]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
RE[4]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by _txf_ on Tue 5th Feb 2013 18:38
in reply to "RE[3]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
"-Blame MS for lack of SD
What!? This I HAVE to hear. "
Yeah, highly unsubstantiated, but I suspect google does not want to pay the extortion fees for the FAT patents that ms is "licensing" hence no FAT based storage, which then means no reason to bother with SD support (FAT is a pile of crap anyway).





Member since:
2008-03-17
-Blame MS for lack of SD
-Blame the consumer for lack of removable battery
-Blame the carriers, and economics for lack of LTE
Seriously, if you want these things you're welcome to go to those phones whose manufacturers have paid the respective extorsion fees. I'm quite happy with the cheap Nexus 4, thank you very much.
Seriously what is it with people and LTE? It is only a way to eat more battery and hit your download limits more quickly. The other points I can understand griping about...