Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551484
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by grahamtriggs
by Soulbender on Tue 5th Feb 2013 07:22
in reply to "Comment by grahamtriggs"
RE: Comment by grahamtriggs
by nej_simon on Tue 5th Feb 2013 13:54
in reply to "Comment by grahamtriggs"
Not only are there an awful lot of inaccuracies (as has already been pointed out), not only is it ridiculous to make a comparison between S3 and "Android 4.0" (when S3 is already on 4.1, the Galaxy Nexus was always 4.1 and has been upgraded to 4.2, and the Nexus 4 was always 4.2)...
Galaxy nexus was in fact on 4.0 when it was released, similar to the S3.




Member since:
2009-05-27
Not only are there an awful lot of inaccuracies (as has already been pointed out), not only is it ridiculous to make a comparison between S3 and "Android 4.0" (when S3 is already on 4.1, the Galaxy Nexus was always 4.1 and has been upgraded to 4.2, and the Nexus 4 was always 4.2)...
But in the MicroSD comparison (which, yes, is an advantage as the Nexus doesn't have one), it's stated that he would *still* give a small advantage to the S3 even if the Nexus had a MicroSD slot. WTF? That would make them *identical*.
Yes, there are things that separate the S3 from a Nexus, and for some people they may warrant purchasing an S3. We all have different requirements. But this article smacks of desperation.