Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Many people think that all Androids are equal and it's a race to the bottom where the cheapest vendor wins. This could not be farther from the truth. For me, it all began half-a-year ago, when I bought the Samsung Galaxy S III and was absolutely stunned by it, then exploring and comparing it with other Androids. Now that Google has fired a shot across the bow with its low pricing for the unlocked Nexus 4, where does that leave Samsung and its flagship handset?
Thread beginning with comment 551491
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ugly ttabloid journalism at OSnews
by 1024 on Tue 5th Feb 2013 08:14 UTC
1024
Member since:
2013-02-05

With this article full of opinions and wild claims, OSnews now approaches a new market: tabloid journalism.

Sadly, this means it loses old readers.

Edited 2013-02-05 08:16 UTC

Reply Score: 1

David Member since:
1997-10-01

I can understand why you might disagree with the author's conclusions. I expected that many people might. However, I'm curious as to why giving a Samsung fan a platform to make his case is "tabloid journalism."

Personally, I would only buy an Android device that ran vanilla Android, and I always considered carrier-modified Android versions to be something that "low-information consumers" had foisted on them. I was intrigued to learn that there are some consumers who think that Samsung's version, at least, is an actual improvement. It seemed like a worthy topic of debate for OSNews. I'd like to hear why you disagree.

Reply Parent Score: 1