Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Many people think that all Androids are equal and it's a race to the bottom where the cheapest vendor wins. This could not be farther from the truth. For me, it all began half-a-year ago, when I bought the Samsung Galaxy S III and was absolutely stunned by it, then exploring and comparing it with other Androids. Now that Google has fired a shot across the bow with its low pricing for the unlocked Nexus 4, where does that leave Samsung and its flagship handset?
Thread beginning with comment 551506
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sir, you have balls
by Lava_Croft on Tue 5th Feb 2013 10:20 UTC
Lava_Croft
Member since:
2006-12-24

I wouldn't dare to write an article that applauds the horrible things Samsung has done to vanilla Android and then put the article full of things that are simply not true.

Respect.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Sir, you have balls
by Alexey Technologov on Tue 5th Feb 2013 10:55 in reply to "Sir, you have balls"
Alexey Technologov Member since:
2007-03-16

I wouldn't dare to write an article that applauds the horrible things Samsung has done to vanilla Android and then put the article full of things that are simply not true.


Except, that everything *is* True. Tested and verified.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Sir, you have balls
by WereCatf on Tue 5th Feb 2013 11:44 in reply to "Sir, you have balls"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

I wouldn't dare to write an article that applauds the horrible things Samsung has done to vanilla Android and then put the article full of things that are simply not true.


I don't really see any out-right lies there, but as I don't own any device with vanilla Android I may have missed something. Would you please point the lies out for me? I'd say it's just mostly a misguided opinion piece, not an attempt at spreading lies. I certainly don't agree with the article myself.

Edited 2013-02-05 11:55 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Sir, you have balls
by _txf_ on Tue 5th Feb 2013 12:42 in reply to "RE: Sir, you have balls"
_txf_ Member since:
2008-03-17

I don't really see any out-right lies there


Inaccuracies count as not truth. I doubt the OP implied that the author intended to lie.

Reply Parent Score: 2