Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Feb 2013 22:10 UTC
Google "People are, unsurprisingly, upset that Microsoft have imposed UEFI Secure Boot on the x86 market. A situation in which one company gets to determine which software will boot on systems by default is obviously open to abuse. What's more surprising is that many of the people who are upset about this are completely fine with encouraging people to buy Chromebooks. Out of the box, Chromebooks are even more locked down than Windows 8 machines." Good point.
Thread beginning with comment 551530
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Businesses primary purpose is to make money; the product is equity payments and the customers are the shareholders. Those shiney blinky light products are simply a tool used in producing the companies real product.

It's perfectly rational to expect vendors to exclude optional features. If managing and/or disabling secure-boot is an optional feature, you can be sure it'll be excluded to reduce production costs when maximizing profit margins.

It get's even better. Now you can claim that managable secure-boot is a premium feature only available in your high end products and you can charge the chattle more for the privaledge. You pull an even bigger profit margin out of the premium products passing that on to your real customers; shareholders.

Unless something has changed, manageable secure-boot is also only an option for Intel based machines so all those ARM based win8 machines are guaranteed not to include the option to allow hardware owner control over there purchased property.

Yet, all I could see in the linked article was that unlocking your chromebook bootloader will delete current user data. So, not at all different from unlocking an Android device; you do it right after purchase or take a backup of your data to restore after unlocking. "not a big deal" (tm)

Reply Parent Score: 2