Linked by Alexey Eromenko on Fri 1st Feb 2013 21:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551556
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by bentoo on Tue 5th Feb 2013 19:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
Yeah, highly unsubstantiated, but I suspect google does not want to pay the extortion fees for the FAT patents that ms is "licensing" hence no FAT based storage, which then means no reason to bother with SD support (FAT is a pile of crap anyway).
Nice try. Nexus devices have native FAT/FAT32 support. (At least the Nexus 7 and 10 which I've used with USB OTG.)
Edited 2013-02-05 19:49 UTC
RE[6]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features
by _txf_ on Tue 5th Feb 2013 20:32
in reply to "RE[5]: Positives for S3 should only be for unique features"
Nice try. Nexus devices have native FAT/FAT32 support. (At least the Nexus 7 and 10 which I've used with USB OTG.)
Well then, I'm wrong...
My next theory then is that google wants people to use the cloud? Judging from the demand for Nexus ( 4 in particular) devices most people don't seem to mind.
There is something to be said about not using FAT for permanent storage. I had a device with an sd card and the fat got corrupted (as it does) and I lost all sorts of stuff...
Edited 2013-02-05 20:38 UTC





Member since:
2008-03-17
What!? This I HAVE to hear. "
Yeah, highly unsubstantiated, but I suspect google does not want to pay the extortion fees for the FAT patents that ms is "licensing" hence no FAT based storage, which then means no reason to bother with SD support (FAT is a pile of crap anyway).