Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Feb 2013 14:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551580
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Microsoft was asking for a lot of control for the $2 Billion. Dell's Server line running Linux did a lot of business is a part of the market MIcrosoft was losing share in. Bet you they stop offering Linux at all soon.
Sources? Or is this just normal anti-Microsoft paranoia?
Sources? Or is this just normal anti-Microsoft paranoia?
If you had a chance to work on a company that made a deal (no matter which one) with Microsoft, you know that deal comes with "required conditions"
Conditions like:
a. Sell only MS products
b. Use only MS products for your company (only exception is Graphic Departments that can use Macs cause we suck).
Don't know how legal that can be, but have seen it. "
Prove it.
And regarding Dell not offering Linux servers anymore -- that's funny.
Edited 2013-02-06 01:18 UTC
"Microsoft was asking for a lot of control for the $2 Billion. Dell's Server line running Linux did a lot of business is a part of the market MIcrosoft was losing share in. Bet you they stop offering Linux at all soon.
Sources? Or is this just normal anti-Microsoft paranoia?
Sources? Or is this just normal anti-Microsoft paranoia?
If you had a chance to work on a company that made a deal (no matter which one) with Microsoft, you know that deal comes with "required conditions"
Conditions like:
a. Sell only MS products
b. Use only MS products for your company (only exception is Graphic Departments that can use Macs cause we suck).
Don't know how legal that can be, but have seen it. "
Maybe we are now starting to see something different from Microsoft?
Linux (the kernel) has twice the market share (over the entire computing market, which covers far more machines than just the desktop) than the Windows kernel does.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/linux-windows-microsoft-android-io...
Anyone offering servers does more business with Linux machines than Windows. Dell included.
Finally, even on the desktop, Microsoft's attitude to Linux (which previously seems to have been that Linux must be killed at all costs) may possibly be slowly changing:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTI5MzU
Microsoft Looking At Office For Linux In 2014
From a source in Brussels, Belgium during the Free Open-Source Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM) this past weekend, I was informed that Microsoft is having a "meaningful look" at a full Linux port of Office thanks to Linux showing signs of commercial viability on the desktop.
!!!!
Edited 2013-02-06 09:30 UTC




Member since:
2006-07-14
Sources? Or is this just normal anti-Microsoft paranoia?
If you had a chance to work on a company that made a deal (no matter which one) with Microsoft, you know that deal comes with "required conditions"
Conditions like:
a. Sell only MS products
b. Use only MS products for your company (only exception is Graphic Departments that can use Macs cause we suck).
Don't know how legal that can be, but have seen it.
Edited 2013-02-05 22:45 UTC