Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Feb 2013 11:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551650
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-06
On RT where they restrict our ability to install "legacy" apps we complain that they are restricting us.
Do you see the problem here.
Yes, I do see the problem: you either have an actual desktop or you don't (half assed compromise solutions don't cut it) and you should be consistent with your decision to release a primarily touch based device and go full metro there instead of squeezing a limited desktop only because their own apps are not ready.
I mean, the only reason you have a "legacy" desktop on the surfaceRT is because Office completely missed the deadline to go metro-style. Isn't that pathetic?