Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Feb 2013 11:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551668
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The premise is unsound given existing hardware realities.
If hardware realities favored a sound implementation then costs would also be decreased for competing alternatives.
But the more important point here is that Surface is just another example of how Microsoft detached itself from reality thanks to Ballmer's mad drive to "get even" with Apple.
How do you solve the "lap problem"?
And I think it's absurd to say that Win 8 also doesn't have a far bigger "schizophrenia problem" as well.
Waiting on hardware that's always just on the horizon isn't going to allow Microsoft to leapfrog or even carve a small niche out of the success Apple is already achieving.




Member since:
2005-11-29
The implementation in this particular case is not where it should be. The overall idea is a good one in my opinion. Devices are converging.