Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Feb 2013 20:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551832
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
WorknMan,
"I don't think most people want to install Java unless they absolutely have to, esp with all the vulnerabilities I've seen reported on the tech news blogs."
I don't think that's really fair.
Most of the security vulnerabilities I've seen are only applicable to contexts in which the virtual machine is intentionally running buggy and untrusted code, such as in applets. All too often java's security is compared to languages which have no containment security whatsoever, like C. In other words, java code needs a privilege escalation to reach the same level of security that a C program starts out with.
In the context of a program we intentionally download and trust implicitly, I'd be surprised if anyone could make a strong case against the security of Java programs compared to C, although I welcome information to the contrary.