Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Feb 2013 20:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551852
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Linux version is very poorly packaged
by ricegf on Fri 8th Feb 2013 11:08
in reply to "RE: Linux version is very poorly packaged"
RE[3]: Linux version is very poorly packaged
by ebasconp on Fri 8th Feb 2013 17:04
in reply to "RE[2]: Linux version is very poorly packaged"
should I blame the ubiquitous Linux repos and their single-click installs and automatic updates instead? Hmmm...
Yes, you should!
I actually prefer the Mac way where every app is self contained. Duplicity of "shared-libraries" exists but such duplicity solves the versioning DLL hell.
PC-BSD's PBI installers work in this way too; easier to install, remove, deploy, etc.
Edited 2013-02-08 17:09 UTC
RE[2]: Linux version is very poorly packaged
by gilboa on Sun 10th Feb 2013 06:50
in reply to "RE: Linux version is very poorly packaged"
RE[2]: Linux version is very poorly packaged
by hussam on Sun 10th Feb 2013 07:29
in reply to "RE: Linux version is very poorly packaged"
Look at the Windows package, a single MSI with everything you need to install and run the program (minus Java of course). Double click, run, install. Done.
Blame "The Unix Way" mentality for the poor packaging/distribution on Linux.
Blame "The Unix Way" mentality for the poor packaging/distribution on Linux.
That's not correct. Windows packaging is terrible. No tracking of shared dependencies. Poor tracking of installed files. Installing application B can overwrite files installed by Application A.
No easy upgrade paths unless programmed by the packager...
Need I go on?
On linux, a package can be installed with a single command that my grandma can type. easily upgradable packages, tracking of shared dependencies, excellent tracking of installed files. Package managers also warn and/or block two packages from installing the same file in the same location.
The main reason why I dropped windows in 2004 IS the software installation/packaging hell.




Member since:
2007-08-05
Look at the Windows package, a single MSI with everything you need to install and run the program (minus Java of course). Double click, run, install. Done.
Blame "The Unix Way" mentality for the poor packaging/distribution on Linux.