To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
siride,
"The fact that Windows can completely change its kernel and graphical implementation without breaking most programs written 20+ years ago is nothing short of an engineering miracle."
I mostly agree, but it hasn't been completely smooth. Some of the stuff I wrote in VB in the 90s stopped working. Of course the only reason I found out was because I was poking around my early career archive for fun. Someone would need to test a large sample of software from that era to assess how well compatibility has held up in general.
Another article that was along these lines:
http://www.osnews.com/story/26623/Why_was_Pinball_removed_from_Wind...
Keyword "mostly".
And, in any case, it's much better than compared to OS X or, especially, Linux. You have to rewrite programs written for different versions of the same GUI toolkit. The only thing you can really count on is the kernel interface and, to a greater or lesser extent, glibc's interface. Everything else is subject to change (and change it does).




Member since:
2006-01-02
And all the backwards compatibility stuff that people complain about...that takes a huge amount of work. The fact that Windows can completely change its kernel and graphical implementation without breaking most programs written 20+ years ago is nothing short of an engineering miracle.