Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Feb 2013 22:18 UTC, submitted by Nth_Man
Thread beginning with comment 552160
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Am I alone in thinking this leaves lots of opportunities for ransom malware and general bad behaviour?
No, you're not alone. "Bricking" a Samsung UEFI computer is very, very harmful and "secure boot"+UEFI can also cause harmful "not booting" problems even without the Samsung UEFI bug.
Is the solution worse tan the problem?
I think so, too.




Member since:
2006-02-22
Doesn't secure boot do this by design? For average users one of the worst thing they perceive can happen, is their box wont boot. Secure boot means that if there is a change in the booting system, kernel etc then the box wont boot.
Am I alone in thinking this leaves lots of opportunities for ransom maleware and general bad behaviour? Is the solution worse tan the problem?