Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Feb 2013 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552251
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
lucas_maximus,
"I think my personal preferences are actually important as they are pretty basic criticisms. Which the article basically addresses with 'haters will be haters'"
Your absolutely right, the author attempts to deflect criticism with immature ad-hominem quotes like the following.
"Controversial with [Internet controversialists]. People who complain about this are complainers. Features like this are useful because they let you know who likes to complain about things for no good reason. Go has a lot of features like this."
I find the attitude unfortunate because it seems to detract from an otherwise reasonable overview of the language.