To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No one needs a tablet. It's got all the things that make a phone suck except one (size), replacing that one drawback with the exact same in the opposite direction. It's too large to be really portable, but suffers from still being just a touch screen, which, for all its hype, is a terrible interface.
People want tablets because their phones are too small.
I got a Nexus 4 (4.7") just today. It's still slightly too small, but actually a lot more pocketable than my old Nokia N9 (4"), due to its slimness and rounded edges. A lot can be done for pocketability just through sensible design.
Oh, I agree no one needs a tablet. A laptop is much more powerful and it's also portable.
But a tablet can be very convinient. It's easy to pick up, instantly usable and massive battery life. My laptop usage has dropped to almost zero since I bought an iPad.
For quick Internet access it's too much hassle to power up a laptop, but grabbing a tablet is easy.
Sent from my iPad
"People want tablets because their phones are too small."
I think a good deal of iPad users bought one because it does everything they used their PC for but it's easier/safer/slicker (their perspective) and more sofa friendly... not saying many on here would consider it a replacement for a computer but it sure is for someone who only bought a Windows system to browse the web and check e-mail.
Edited 2013-02-15 01:04 UTC




Member since:
2011-05-12
I think people who do so much with their phone that they think it's too small just need a tablet.
When I'm on the move I don't have the time/possibility to stare at my phone so long, let alone actively use it. I used to to read emails, news, look up something, send/read messages, even make a call sometimes. But these are all quick actions. On the move I want something that easily fits in my clothes and hands.
I have an iPad with no 3G, because that didn't make sense to me. I use it at home, at work or in hotel lobbies. WiFi is everywhere. But I don't go wondering the streets with it. Not just because it's too big for that, but also because it would be overkill.
When I roam the streets I never see tablets, while I see many at work, in people's homes. That's their strength: portability and ease of use in a relaxed environment (when you can sit).
For serious mobile work I'd for for a laptop and for serious static work the desktop is king.
Devices like the Transformer or Surface with detachable keyboards are nice, but I think it is also more cumbersome. My iPad keyboards are seldom used. Attaching a keyboard ruins the tablet experience.
To be honest, I have never used (or seen) a Surface or Transformer, so they may work better than an iPad with keyboard.
This is all of course my personal preference. I just thin each device category has it's strengths and weaknesses that are clear. If you come up with hybrid devices that sit between categories they tend to inherit more of the weaknesses than strengths of their bordering categories. A tablet with a keyboard loses its portability strength, while not gaining the power of a laptop.
Creating a Windows phone with real Windows and hook it up to a bunch of devices destroys its portability. It's not longer a mobile phone and a terrible desktop compared to a desktop.
I don't think it's about the hardware, it's about the data and the software. If I can get at my data with <any> device I can simply pick the right device for the right situation and access my data.
So I'd rather have Microsoft make a great phone, regardless on what it's software internals are based, and someone else make a great computer.
Like I said it's my personal view and the Microsoft Surface commercials are full of happy people so I guess there are people in both camps of the argument.