Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Feb 2013 13:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552384
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow
by Adurbe on Wed 13th Feb 2013 22:24
in reply to "RE: Comment by ssokolow"
I am currently testing a UK Very large client's customer-facing website.
Their usage stats looks something like below;
IE8 ~15% of all traffic to the site
IE9 ~20%
Firefox ~20%
Chrome ~30%
The rest is made up of other browsers or variations inc Opera and IE10. We simply can't justify the resource as a business to test theses browsers at this time.
I WISH I could stop testing IE8 (as does tend to throw up a number of issues on more advanced features) but the commercial reality is you cant ignore them.
I hope you actually look at the business requirements of your customers before deciding the the irrelevancy of a rendering engine
RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow
by moondevil on Thu 14th Feb 2013 06:19
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow"
RE[3]: Comment by ssokolow
by lucas_maximus on Thu 14th Feb 2013 09:20
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow"
RE[2]: Comment by ssokolow
by lucas_maximus on Thu 14th Feb 2013 08:12
in reply to "RE: Comment by ssokolow"




Member since:
2008-11-25
Three engines? Trident isn't worth testing, nobody uses IE except to download chrome or Firefox, unless they are forced to use it at work.
...I would love to be able to say.
I wish MS would make it multiplatform already, so I didn't need to virtualise just for their engine.
Edited 2013-02-13 21:26 UTC