Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Feb 2013 13:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552399
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by cdude on Thu 14th Feb 2013 15:32
in reply to "RE[6]: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
RE[8]: Opera doesn't want to be populair
by telns on Thu 14th Feb 2013 17:51
in reply to "RE[7]: Opera doesn't want to be populair"
Unless they fork it, they can only extend the project in ways that are beneficial to the community in general, and their submissions will have to be approved.
There is a lot of good that comes from participating in a large, free project like WebKit, but it isn't all roses. There is also a lot of uncertainty and loss of control that comes with it.
If you can't see how that works, I'm not really sure how else to convey it. The closest analogy is that it is like renting your house instead of owning it. You can paint the walls (if you get permission), but you can't remodel the kitchen.





Member since:
2009-06-18
Umm... I have. I have done some custom [proof-of-concept] type projects using the Qt5WebKit codebase.
I like it just fine. But that doesn't mean that it will provide 100% of what Presto provides in a convenient way.
I would say exactly the same thing in reverse if someone were trying to take the Presto engine--which I am sure is also a good code base--and stick it into a long-term WebKit project.
Edited 2013-02-13 22:59 UTC