Linked by Julian Djamil Fagir on Thu 14th Feb 2013 22:23 UTC
BSD and Darwin derivatives BSD (Berkely System Distribution) was a research operating system based on the original AT&T Unix, developed by the University of Berkeley, California. It has been Open Source right from the beginning, and after the university lost interest in developing it further, several community projects started up (the very first ones were NetBSD and FreeBSD in the early nineties) to continue developing BSD. Anyway, Linux was born roughly at the same time, but a pending lawsuit about copyright infringements prevented the BSD projects to become as successful as Linux (though you could argue about the exact reasons).
Thread beginning with comment 552540
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Drumhellar
by Drumhellar on Fri 15th Feb 2013 01:27 UTC
Drumhellar
Member since:
2005-07-12

Eventually, the security team announced they didn't find anything security-relevant, but still recommend not to trust binary package installations made in that time frame. In December, everything was completely back online.


The package build system isn't yet up. Certain FreeBSD 9.0 binary packages are older than what's available in ports, and 9.1 doesn't have any binary packages available yet.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Comment by Drumhellar
by marcp on Mon 18th Feb 2013 09:51 in reply to "Comment by Drumhellar"
marcp Member since:
2007-11-23

And that's a real PITA. It's like releasing a car without wheels. But who cares? the car is there ...

Do your sh#t thoroughly, then release. Never the other way around. Otherwise you're heading to disaster [or Linux].

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Drumhellar on Mon 18th Feb 2013 19:13 in reply to "RE: Comment by Drumhellar"
Drumhellar Member since:
2005-07-12

And that's a real PITA. It's like releasing a car without wheels. But who cares? the car is there ...


Except the packages produced by the build system aren't part of the release, while the wheels are part of the car. This isn't semantics; even when extra packages were included on the install disks, they were referred to as "third-party" packages.

I hate car analogies for computers, but a better analogy would be "The car is ready, but it'll be a while before after-market add-ons are available."

Even when packages are available, I find myself building from ports frequently, just for the greater control, and I'm willing to bet that anybody that administers FreeBSD systems professionally will rely on ports much, much more.

Packages build for 9.0 should also work perfectly on 9.1, but the packages build for 9.0 aren't being updated at the moment, either (Though, the ports tree is).

Reply Parent Score: 2