
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How do you know if I have Google Wallet?
No, he is precisely wrong. Extending the ability to offer refunds to developers doesn't change the seller/agent model in the least. We could compare the terms and services of the agreements if you'd like, but the simplest way to point out that it is still a seller/agent model is that the seller doesn't get access to the money on a transactional basis. Google provides monthly payouts (when they can do so on time) with their agency % removed.
The money is not flowing directly to the developer at all. The developer is not then obligated to pay back Google's share at all.
All that is different is that Google has offloaded a small measure of customer service to its developers (this has pros as well as cons) and they've tied those devs to their PayPal clone. That doesn't alter the seller/agent relationship.
Edited 2013-02-16 05:33 UTC
Member since:
2011-04-25
No, just wrong, patently false.
Google does not pass on 100% of app revenue to devs and then get payed back a 30% cut. And Apple and Amazon aren't different because you decided to use "royalties" inappropriately.
Such misinformation is not helpful, nor do I even see how, if such a setup were the case, that would impact this privacy issue anyway. It simply sounds like tortured and incorrect rationalization in hopes of handwaving away a real privacy issue.
Edited 2013-02-15 19:05 UTC