Linked by Julian Djamil Fagir on Thu 14th Feb 2013 22:23 UTC
BSD and Darwin derivatives BSD (Berkely System Distribution) was a research operating system based on the original AT&T Unix, developed by the University of Berkeley, California. It has been Open Source right from the beginning, and after the university lost interest in developing it further, several community projects started up (the very first ones were NetBSD and FreeBSD in the early nineties) to continue developing BSD. Anyway, Linux was born roughly at the same time, but a pending lawsuit about copyright infringements prevented the BSD projects to become as successful as Linux (though you could argue about the exact reasons).
Thread beginning with comment 552739
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

TrueCrypt is and always has been open source.


Just because the source is downloadable doesn't make it open source. It's quite possible that the truecrypt license is not compatible with Dragonfly BSD's goal and policies.
A cursory glance indicates that the license is such that it could not be included as part of any BSD.

Reply Parent Score: 4

DaveK Member since:
2013-02-16

"TrueCrypt is and always has been open source.


Just because the source is downloadable doesn't make it open source. It's quite possible that the truecrypt license is not compatible with Dragonfly BSD's goal and policies.
A cursory glance indicates that the license is such that it could not be included as part of any BSD.
"

That's not what "closed source" means. If the article wanted to distinguish between free software and open source, it should have done so, but closed source is unquestionably the wrong one of the three terms to use.

Reply Parent Score: 0

metalf8801 Member since:
2010-03-22

While the license may have change since it was originally rejected it is still not recognized as ether an open source license by the OSI (Open Source Initiative) or as a free software license by the FSF.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truecrypt

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#Tru...

Reply Parent Score: 1

zima Member since:
2005-07-06

That's not what "closed source" means. If the article wanted to distinguish between free software and open source, it should have done so, but closed source is unquestionably the wrong one of the three terms to use.

Neither of the three terms is particularly good. "Shared source" would be probably the best description of Truecrypt.

Reply Parent Score: 2